05D7AAC7-E197-C7F3-DAB4EE85861C8DA7
380C331D-CA75-AD84-598F54A8D2CE9D58
This prize was originally established through an 1854 gift from Hon. Aaron Clark, former mayor of New York City. According to a contemporaneous New York Times article, “Mr. CLARK received his academic education at Clinton, and has not forgotten the friends and benefactors of his youth.” He was awarded an honorary degree from Hamilton in 1838.  It was later reestablished in 1892 through a gift from the Fayerweather estate and supplemented with an award from Henry A. Clark.
 
The 2025 winner will take home $2,400 and will be recognized at the Class and Charter Day ceremony.

Eligibility

The Clark Prize is open to all senior students regardless of concentration.

Requirements

The Clark prize will be awarded to the senior who, through both content and delivery, most effectively addresses the assigned topic. 2025's topic is: How should Hamilton prepare future graduates to engage in civil discourse?

Preliminary Round

To participate in the 2025 Preliminary Round, you must record your speech at the OCC during one of our dedicated recording times. Times will be available between Thursday, February 13 and Monday, February 17, and can be reserved in TracCloud.

You will only have one opportunity to record your speech. You may restart once if you make a major mistake less than one minute in, but you may not come back to re-record.


Scoring

The judges will assign scores on two broad areas: content/organization and delivery. Judges will also score each entry on overall engagement and persuasiveness.

Final round scores are separate from preliminary round scores, but are scored on the same criteria.

Content and Organization
  • Speaker made a clear case for why a Hamilton community member should listen to this speech.
  • Language use was accessible to the listener.
  • A listener could easily follow the organization of the content.
  • Speaker used evidence that supported the main point of the speech.
Delivery
  • Speaker’s use of vocal delivery (volume, pitch, emphasis) enhanced the message.
  • Nonverbal delivery (gestures and eye contact) enhanced the message.
  • Delivery was conversational rather than rotely memorized or read.
Overall Impression
  • The speech addressed the assigned topic in a persuasive manner.
  • The speaker was engaging to watch throughout the presentation.
Scoring Notes

In the event of a tie, overall engagement and persuasiveness will be used to determine the winner.

For the final round, speakers will be shown a countdown of their remaining time. The minimum time is 6 minutes and maximum time is 8 minutes. If speeches run shorter than the minimum or longer than the maximum, they will incur a 5% point penalty after a ten second grace period.


Recent winners

2024

Lily Hirai '24, "Hello my name is" | video

2023

Samuel Lieberman ’23, “Do Androids Dream of Public Speaking?” | video

2022
Cherry Zhang ’22, “How Productive Should I Be? Reflections on the Meanings of Work” | video
2021

Lily Delle-Levine ’21, “Time for Change: Social Media as Social Action” | video

2020

Haotian Yang ’20, “Getting Out There: Make Diversity Happen” | video

Contact

Office / Department Name

Oral Communication Center

Contact Name

Amy Gaffney

Oral Communication Center Director

Help us provide an accessible education, offer innovative resources and programs, and foster intellectual exploration.

Site Search